> This is a really bad idea, as US is known to tap any data they can get on their soil. I think you meant to say, the US is known to tap ALL data we can get ou

> This is a really bad idea, as US is known to tap any data they can get on their soil. I think you meant to say, the US is known to tap ALL data we can get our grubby little paws on. We don't care if it's on our soil or not. AIUI, it's arguably harder if it's on our soil, as then we might be spying on US citizens which requires a touch more paperwork. NOTE: I'm not condoning this behaviour, just stating my understanding of it.