> It is very unlikely that they could have even explored the full parameter space if they wanted to, it's such a huge undertaking... Absolutely agree and no ar

> It is very unlikely that they could have even explored the full parameter space if they wanted to, it's such a huge undertaking... Absolutely agree and no arguments whatsoever. In fact, one of the first things that I joked to myself was that we will soon see papers on MOF-suppoorted version of the catalyst -- well before we see any DoE. In any case, I just want to note that I made the comment in response to the following: > $190 million -> 190 bucks ;) Which appears to be a misunderstanding, as the calculation in question has implicitly taken into account the "millions of times" increase in disinfection efficacy. > I think it'd be a bigger deal if it didn't require pressurization to 10 bar personally, pumps are expensive to operate and catalysts are a one-time-cost (if you're lucky). I felt uncomfortable about the pressure, too, but it was just a hunch. Thank you for putting this into context. :) Edit: clarity, typo.