11 ms·
But the improvements they make wouldn't be open source so the open source version would lack those features, which means we would be stuck having to choose betw
by CorrectHorseBat 5y ago
But the improvements they make wouldn't be open source so the open source version would lack those features, which means we would be stuck having to choose between an outdated Audacity and a non-free Audacity.
- trasz 5y agoOpen Source developers would develop closed version instead of the open one? How?
- CorrectHorseBat 5y agoMuse Group bought Audacity and are developing it now, their developers will use whatever license their employer tells them to use. They are the main developers of Audacity now. Any fork will have to compete with their work.