> I don't see why he would be more qualified to assess the pros/cons of the GPL than the Linux and GCC authors. I don't think he is. I would be equally frustr

> I don't see why he would be more qualified to assess the pros/cons of the GPL than the Linux and GCC authors. I don't think he is. I would be equally frustrated if Linus Torvalds made an argument about the pros and cons of each license and people replied with generic proselytism. My point isn't that Carmack's status means people should automatically listen to him. I'm saying he made a thought-out argument, based on practical considerations, and the way most people answered didn't really address the argument, so much as re-state a previous held belief that license X is better than license Y.