Just because something hasn't been measured, doesn't make a conclusion based on logical reasoning drivel. "Well how do you know that I'll die if I jump off the

Just because something hasn't been measured, doesn't make a conclusion based on logical reasoning drivel. "Well how do you know that I'll die if I jump off the Empire State Building?! You've never seen ME jump off the Empire State building!" I'd say that seeing how much of a beating full-face helmets take when they hit the ground hard, it's a pretty logical leap to assume that anything less than that is going to suffer a worse fate. Unless wrapping it in 10 feet of hair confers some magic physics defying powers. Asking for data when there obviously is none, and then ignoring logical inference is poor form.