2 ms·
"There's no evidence therefore that's proof there was involvement" What? You're trying to pass off absolutely zero evidence as proof.
by 0xy 5y ago
"There's no evidence therefore that's proof there was involvement"
What? You're trying to pass off absolutely zero evidence as proof.
- slownews45 5y agoI was responding to this statement - "Except there was never any evidence that Trump got involved, even after multiple independent reviews." The IG review specifically noted all the ways that Trump / Whitehouse blocked the answer to that question. The Whitehouse then also got rid of IG Fine in April 2020 - I mean, this guy served 28 years in justice then through bush / clinton / obama terms as an IG. Amazon also dug up stuff where Trump promised to GET involved. No one "cleared" trump in this. He stonewalled as long as he could.