3 ms·
Yes and no. Not having centralized IT administration is worse: People able to install their own root-level malware is a dramatic and exciting turn that I think
by ocdtrekkie 5y ago
Yes and no. Not having centralized IT administration is worse: People able to install their own root-level malware is a dramatic and exciting turn that I think everyone is glad to be away from. But IT people are also the worst IT customers: They often think they're too smart to fall for the tricks other employees face, and when they do fall for them, the damage is far worse.
We have narrowed the attack surface of networks drastically, the solution is not to undo that, but to keep narrowing it. There's a lot of room for improvement especially in service accounts, admin accounts, and crucially, more intelligent behavior detection.
Despite Microsoft's best cloud security capabilities, it still doesn't seem to mind if a senior citizen's Outlook.com account is suddenly logged into in Nigeria, and even after "securing the account", it doesn't clear their devices they connected while they were in the account... That's a consumer example, but there's so much room for more intelligent behavior detection, and it to make it down to base-level products, and not expensive add-ons or upgrades. Even the big companies don't do a good job at it on their own systems, much less the systems they sell to other people.
You have to have a certain tier of premium Azure cloud-based subscriptions to get reasonably decent security controls, while if you have a Windows Server-based network, your security options are the same as you had back in 2008.
- vel0city 5y ago> Despite Microsoft's best cloud security capabilities, it still doesn't seem to mind if a senior citizen's Outlook.com account is suddenly logged into in Nigeria Geo-IP services are routinely inaccurate. I'm in the Southern US, the IP I used to get used to get me tagged as if I was from Quebec City. It was like that for over two years. A friend's house a few neighborhoods over showed up as some small town in Kansas. I could go from my home network-wise in allegedly Quebec City to my cell phone which showed as a town about 50 miles away from my actual location to Kansas in 10 minutes. If places banned based on these kinds of Geo-IP databases I'd be banned from most of the internet.
- ocdtrekkie 5y agoEven then, that's on the same continent. If Microsoft can't tell traffic is traveling across an ocean, what on earth are we doing as an industry? And there's a difference between "ban everyone reporting outside their city" and "flag unusual behavior and trigger additional protections or checks". Think how your credit card works when you suddenly make a purchase in Las Vegas. And in my cited example, the logins were reported as malicious to Microsoft, their account panel said the account had been "secured" since then... but Microsoft apparently let an Android phone the attackers linked up in Nigeria remain connected to the account, giving them persistence past password resets.