3 ms·
Once someone is dead, it's hard to call anything "even".
by Yoric 5y ago
Once someone is dead, it's hard to call anything "even".
- jhgb 5y agoIt's also hard to say that you've "killed" someone if you had zero physical involvement in somebody's death. But I guess words are very flexible these days.
- Anonym0u5 5y agoIt's also hard to say you've killed someone when there's zero existing evidence of that somebody's death as well. It's also hard to say that you've killed someone when you never did that, because y'know, message boards are not one person.
- g5095 5y agoIf you take out a hit on someone you have zero physical involvement. If you order troops into a certain death situation you have zero physical involvement. If you drive someone to suicide you have zero physical involvement.. Where did you get the notion you need to be pulling the trigger to be morally responsible for someone's death? I call that killing.
- jhgb 5y agoIf you ordered a hit, you ordered a hit. Why don't you just say that? > Where did you get the notion you need to be pulling the trigger to be morally responsible for someone's death? "Where" is a weird question since I didn't get that notion in the first place. But "being morally responsible for somebody's death" is a vastly more nebulous notion than homicide.
- tomjen3 5y agoYou can balance a corpse with a corpse on the scale of justice, but that would just leave two families ruined.