4 ms·
This entire post has galvanized me to write up an idea I've been noodling over as I work on a reader myself: a standard that would eliminate precisely the waste
by askhan 5y ago
This entire post has galvanized me to write up an idea I've been noodling over as I work on a reader myself: a standard that would eliminate precisely the waste you mention by specifying within the HTML all that's needed for a feed.
See https://sfeed.org https://sfeed.org. In the spirit of the multi-meaninged RSS acronym itself, the S might stand for scrape, selector, speed, or of course Scotty.
Vinni, might you be interested in enabling the standard in Feed Me Up?
- Vinnl 5y agoThere already is such a standard! https://microformats.org/wiki/hatom https://microformats.org/wiki/hatom Happy to take a merge request that adds the option to set `extends = "sfeed"` or `extends = "hatom"` and then automatically sets the correct selectors though. (That said, if a publisher goes through the trouble of adhering to those selectors, they might as well publish a feed while they're at it :)
- detaro 5y agohttps://microformats.org/wiki/h-feed https://microformats.org/wiki/h-feed is the up-to-date version
- askhan 5y agoAh thanks, didn't know about hAtom, will investigate that. I do think it's (much) easier to add some HTML classes than output an entire separate file. I've been using Nuxt + Strapi as my new CMS stack, and while it's a big step forward in so many other ways, outputting an RSS feed is far from automatic.