4 ms·
Of course the theory is used that way, it fits nicely into various political arguments. But that doesn't influence the veracity of the lab leak theory either wa
by corty 5y ago
Of course the theory is used that way, it fits nicely into various political arguments. But that doesn't influence the veracity of the lab leak theory either way.
Looking at the article, it also uses weak arguments to support its thesis:
"She first takes aim at the popular version of the lab leak theory that posits that Covid was taken from nature and escaped in its wild form. The problem with that scenario, she told me, is that a swab from a bat contains very little infectious virus. Each bat weighs less than half an ounce, and each sample is basically a Q-tip swiped briefly over a bat’s mouth or anus. These samples are stored in vials in the freezer; they’re not likely to spill or leak, the way disaster movies have primed us to suppose."
The real-world counter-argument to this is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marburg_virus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marburg_virus
Lab leaks do happen, and all researchers in those labs do have an interest to play down the danger and cover things up to continue working.
- aliasEli 5y agoThere is some evidence that they had live bats in the laboratory. This would make sense, bats are quite different from other mammals, and it seems very likely that some bat viruses can not be cultivated in standard cell cultures.
- scotty79 5y agoMarburg is a different virus. Coronaviruses infection very much depends on the size of viral load. It's not like ebola where single micro droplet is enough.
- aliasEli 5y ago> a swab from a bat contains very little infectious virus We know that they were doing gain of function research, but that only works with live viruses. So they must have some method to cultivate the virus. When they can do that small size of the initial sample is no longer relevant.