2 ms·
seems that the reduction in time forced to cut down on crap - starving the beast so to say - and that would be the major reason for the productivity increase:
by trhway 5y ago
seems that the reduction in time forced to cut down on crap - starving the beast so to say - and that would be the major reason for the productivity increase:
" In their research into working
time reduction in the last few decades of the 20th
century, for instance, Bosch and Lehndorff (2001)
note how a number of workplaces have indicated
that successful reductions in working hours have been
closely tied to changes in the organisation of work —
whether through workers gaining greater autonomy
over work processes, or changes in operating times and
shift patterns. Such reorganisations have clearly had a
positive impact on productivity.
...
The
stated reduction in working hours did lead to staff
actually working less as a direct result of workplaces
implementing new work strategies, and through
organising tasks via cooperation between workers and
managers.
As mentioned earlier, a central aim of both trials was
to ensure service provision remained the same following
reductions in working time. To be able to work less while
providing the same level of service, changes in the
organisation of work therefore had to be implemented.
Most commonly, this was done by rethinking how
tasks were completed: shortening meetings, cutting
out unnecessary tasks, and shifts arrangements"