3 ms·
What is selfish about regulating some things that otherwise put a burden on society and have almost no upside for the individual if not regulated? Even if they
by stkdump 5y ago
What is selfish about regulating some things that otherwise put a burden on society and have almost no upside for the individual if not regulated? Even if they and their families pay the highest cost for their stupidity, this doesn't mean there is no case for regulation.
- abrokenpipe 5y agoYou don't even know if they have families/dependents, and people should be allowed to make their own choices regardless. If you are concerned about the burden of taking care of others then you should criticize universal healthcare rather than try to dictate peoples lives. Don't bring those liabilities into your life if you are unwilling to deal with them.
- jobigoud 5y agoIt's a complicated and interesting debate. In places where we have universal healthcare we want to simultaneously provide coverage for everyone and allow the maximum freedom possible, but these goals are somewhat conflicting. We still think universal healthcare is of paramount importance for the well being of the group, so it takes the priority. This means reckless behavior can be frowned upon, smoking discouraged and seat belts enforced. From my european pov I've always felt universal healthcare would never work in the US due to this focus on individual freedom over almost anything else.