I think they simply meant 'instead of everyone running their own CI', not GH Actions in general - they're asking for a centralized feed repository and not one t

I think they simply meant 'instead of everyone running their own CI', not GH Actions in general - they're asking for a centralized feed repository and not one that is subject to people putting in work every few months to fix things that break, as that's likely to hurt adoption. In my opinion it sounds like a request for an open source/more community maintained feedly.com.