Your claim is fundamentally "It's logistically easier to attack software, so such attacks will happen more often". This is absolutely true, but it's also propo

Your claim is fundamentally "It's logistically easier to attack software, so such attacks will happen more often". This is absolutely true, but it's also proportionally easier to defend software. It's insanely easy to test whether your software is vulnerable to SQL injection, it's not particularly easy to test whether your building can be destroyed with explosives. Combine that with the fact that just about every piece of consumer software on the planet has a laundry list of bugs that don't require malicious intent to reproduce, and I find it very hard to accept that reasoning for software developers absconding responsibility.