> what would the GPL violation be in this case? Since it incorporates GPL source code, the entire copilot neural network needs to distributed under the GPL and

> what would the GPL violation be in this case? Since it incorporates GPL source code, the entire copilot neural network needs to distributed under the GPL and - since it is a non-source form of the software - it's entire corresponding source (namely, the entire training dataset it was generated from) needs to be made available, also under the GPL, to anyone it's distributed to. (AGPL is a bit^Wlot more clear about the fact that remote interaction over a network is a kind of distribution, though.)