Huh? The article is full of waffle, but in the condensed form it shills for: (a) treating an adopted code as «trivial» as i++, which is pure demagogy because w

Huh? The article is full of waffle, but in the condensed form it shills for: (a) treating an adopted code as «trivial» as i++, which is pure demagogy because what we've seen already on that CoPilot video is NOT trivial (b) dismissal of (let me put it straight) piracy as somewhat special case of fair-use, which is valid only when code in question stays on video as prop, the real code ISN'T fair-use (c) accepting (a) and (b) above as ultimate truth just because bogey stricter copyright laws hurts FOSS. And the water is wet. This is absolutely meaningless filler because we know what stricter copyright laws hurts everyone since Napster days. So my overall impression from this reading is just... Huh? > My name is Julia, I'm the Pirate in the European Parliament. Didn't she split with Piratenpartei?