> > They did not copy the implementation, they copied the general idea of what the algorithm should do > [Citation needed] (Not really your point, as such, bu

> > They did not copy the implementation, they copied the general idea of what the algorithm should do > [Citation needed] (Not really your point, as such, but) no, actually, if you claim they did something (nominally[0]) wrong, the onus is on you to provide citations showing they did it[1]. 0: > From an IP absolutist standpoint 1: Well, or that they (voluntarily and explicitly) accepted some responsibility (such as a job as a police officer) that entails a higher level of scrutiny than innocent-until-proven-guilty, but that's not really relevant here.