4 ms·
If not, can we call them "subjects"?
by NullPrefix 5y ago
If not, can we call them "subjects"?
- dvfjsdhgfv 5y agoI think it's a semantic misunderstanding. In the original question "object" was meant as a "physical object", as opposed to a kind of phenomenon like reflection and so on. You have used a more philosophical definition of subject-object dichotomy. On an unrelated note, I've seen a couple of books whose authors claim UFOs are actually subject-related phenomena.