3 ms·
I’m a big fan of WebDAV. As a bonus, you can host tiddlywiki in WebDAV and it just works. The only downside as far as I can tell is WebDAV support in Windows E
by jchw 5y ago
I’m a big fan of WebDAV. As a bonus, you can host tiddlywiki in WebDAV and it just works.
The only downside as far as I can tell is WebDAV support in Windows Explorer has problems with modern TLS setups.
- dashezup 5y agoHaven't use Windows for a while, on macOS I used to use NFS to access files on a LAN server but switched to WebDAV as well because it seems easier and cleaner to use WebDAV compare to SMB/NFS, since it does not require extra services or opened ports on server. Nowadays I mainly use linux distro, the main use case of accessing files from LAN server is watching movies or TV series. I just create m3u/m3u8 playlist on server and play it through HTTP (not necessarily use WebDAV in this case). this way could avoid potential troubles I could get from mounting a remote directory. # LAN server ls -1 *.mp4 >playlist.m3u # computer, mpv with "save-position-on-quit" mpv http://raspberrypi.lan/path/to/playlist.m3u
- chocolatkey 5y agoThe problem with webdav on windows explorer for me has always been the lag. Windows explorer has never really handled remotes with latency well, and webdav is one of those when you access a server across the globe