3 ms·
Wouldn't 3 better than? For quorum?
by Bombthecat 5y ago
Wouldn't 3 better than? For quorum?
- petschge 5y agoThey would. But it is harder to get funding for three than it is to get funding for two...
- ncallaway 5y agoIf you had infinite resources, sure! It’s a cost benefit analysis (and one I’m not remotely equipped to make). My guess is they went with two sites because that was the smallest number they could get away with while still being able to make detections.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]