4 ms·

It is nonconsensual when the starting premise is "using Audacity". "Consensual" in that case would mean opt-in telemetry.

• akerl_ 5y ago
  That’s some serious mental gymnastics. I’ll be sure file a complaint at the supermarket for nonconsenual collections: I wanted to take the vegetables home, but they don’t let me opt out of paying.
  • elmo2you 5y ago
    Unless the telemetry is somehow a form of payment for using the (open source) product, I think your argument falls under: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
    • akerl_ 5y ago
      Given that the context here is “a producer of something setting the terms under which they’ll give it to somebody else”, my grocery store hardly sounds like an extreme example.
      • Dagger2 5y ago
        It is when you add telemetry to your vegetables. Imagine if your grocery store terms were that you have to pay to take them home... and also that you must consent to a grocery store employee following you home and sitting in your kitchen, watching your vegetables. They'd take note of how and where you store them, when you use them, how you prepare them, how much you eat in each sitting, what meals you eat them with, and how satisfied you seem to be with them. They'd report all of this information back to the grocery store. They'd also report anything else they see or hear and decide they might be interested in later on. Does that really not sound extreme?