4 ms·
> There is no policy that can change that fact. That statement is completely false. There are many policies that China and India can enact to reduce production
by vegetablepotpie 5y ago
> There is no policy that can change that fact.
That statement is completely false. There are many policies that China and India can enact to reduce production of greenhouse gasses.
- put a price on carbon emissions (ex: California cap and trade)
- put a tax on carbon (ex: Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act)
- provide grants or tax breaks to clean energy projects
- hhw 5y agoWhy focus on China and India, when on a per capita basis they have a small fraction of the carbon footprint that we have in Canada and the US? When we can get our per capita carbon footprint down below theirs, then maybe we'll have a right to criticize their environmental policies. But in the meantime if we're being at all objective, trying to point a finger at them makes us look like absolute hypocrites.
- vegetablepotpie 5y agoIf you read the Great-grand parent comment, which I authored. I advocated for the US to lead by example to encourage other nations to drop their GHG emissions to zero. Having China and India, being large producers of GHGs, reduce their emissions is necessary but not sufficient to stop further climate change.
- nate_meurer 5y agoI agree about the West's hypocrisy, but per-capita emissions is a red herring. Regardless of how many people live there, the Chinese government controls the most polluting economy in the history of civilization. The CCP is thus in the position to help more than any other entity in the world right now.
- ipaddr 5y agoBecause removing Canada completely doesn't begin to solve the issue. You need to look at total pollution by country because decisions are made at the country level.