Yes, it looks like unfinished work. They could have: - implemented plagiarism detection to attribute code to its source (where possible), then present the resu

Yes, it looks like unfinished work. They could have: - implemented plagiarism detection to attribute code to its source (where possible), then present the result together with the link. This makes Copilot same with Googling your answer and then copy-pasting the code. You are fully responsible - implemented some regexes to filter out secrets, or even better, change the secrets to random values in the training data - implemented a robots.txt like system so people have a method to ban the Copilot spider from their code If they did these things before release it would have been so much better. But they are simple fixes so I see no technical obstacle.