4 ms·

Not OP, but I can address this. Leading by example does not compel anyone to act, it works the same way that nuclear treaties do not reduce nuclear arms. But we

Not OP, but I can address this. Leading by example does not compel anyone to act, it works the same way that nuclear treaties do not reduce nuclear arms. But we still have treaties and we have had no nuclear war in the last 70 years. Leading by example is necessary but not sufficient for carbon reduction. But it removes accusations of hypocrisy when talking about solutions, which makes discussions much more productive. China does have climate policy and it’s and issue that they do not ignore. They plant trees at the interface of deserts to prevent their expansion, they produce 80% of the worlds solar panels. China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States. China has a lot to lose from climate change. They will see reduced agricultural production from prairie land, in a country of over a billion people. A starving population will not allow the current regime to continue and the Chinese government has every reason to come to the table.

mercy_dude 5y ago
> China does have climate policy and it’s and issue that they do not ignore. They plant trees at the interface of deserts to prevent their expansion, they produce 80% of the worlds solar panels. China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States. Sounds like you are avoiding the core question surrounding the real issue at hand - China and India are among one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas. There is no policy that can change that fact.
- vegetablepotpie 5y ago
  > There is no policy that can change that fact. That statement is completely false. There are many policies that China and India can enact to reduce production of greenhouse gasses. - put a price on carbon emissions (ex: California cap and trade) - put a tax on carbon (ex: Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act) - provide grants or tax breaks to clean energy projects
  - hhw 5y ago
    Why focus on China and India, when on a per capita basis they have a small fraction of the carbon footprint that we have in Canada and the US? When we can get our per capita carbon footprint down below theirs, then maybe we'll have a right to criticize their environmental policies. But in the meantime if we're being at all objective, trying to point a finger at them makes us look like absolute hypocrites.
    - vegetablepotpie 5y ago
      If you read the Great-grand parent comment, which I authored. I advocated for the US to lead by example to encourage other nations to drop their GHG emissions to zero. Having China and India, being large producers of GHGs, reduce their emissions is necessary but not sufficient to stop further climate change.
    - nate_meurer 5y ago
      I agree about the West's hypocrisy, but per-capita emissions is a red herring. Regardless of how many people live there, the Chinese government controls the most polluting economy in the history of civilization. The CCP is thus in the position to help more than any other entity in the world right now.
    - ipaddr 5y ago
      Because removing Canada completely doesn't begin to solve the issue. You need to look at total pollution by country because decisions are made at the country level.
- elric 5y ago
  What policy are you suggesting? Are you implying that the Chinese (and Indians) are somehow less deserving of living their lives out of poverty and in relative comfort? Because that's what this is ultimately about. These are both countries with huge populations. Populations who until recently were extremely poor. They are becoming less so, sometimes at speeds that are hard to fathom. Do you want to be the person to tell 1 billion Chinese that, no, they can't buy a fridge? China and India aren't vomiting greenhouse gases just to screw the rest of the world. They're doing it to feed their people and enable them to live their lives.
  - ipaddr 5y ago
    Why is China producing 5 times more greenhouse gas than India at similiar populations?
- throwaway210222 5y ago
  > China and India are among one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas. There is no policy that can change that fact. Fine, I'll bite. Presume for a second that the partitioning of India didn't end with Pakistan and Bangladesh, but that the entire sub-continent split into 15 odd countries each with the population of Mexico. Would you still be demanding that just these 15 countries carry the disproportionate burden of solving climate change? You wouldn't, because is would be painfully, obviously dumb to ignore other similar sized groups of countries (Europe, SE asia, etc.) India and China obviously emit more, because they are - uniquely - single countries with continent sized populations. They don't suddenly earn some moral burden for that in an atmosphere that is without borders.
  - ipaddr 5y ago
    China produces much for the world. Offshoring production to them has put them in a unique position where they produce much of the world's greenhouse gases. Population size doesn't matter. China produces 5 times more than India. More than double the US at similiar economic levels. China is the problem. China is the solution. China produces more greenhouse gases than all developed nations combined.
    - throwaway210222 5y ago
      > China is the problem. China is the solution. Then I assume the west will ensure China has access to any and all technology that they decide they need, when they need it, how they need it, to reduce their carbon footprint. Because that is what it is going to take.

mercy_dude 5y ago

> China does have climate policy and it’s and issue that they do not ignore. They plant trees at the interface of deserts to prevent their expansion, they produce 80% of the worlds solar panels. China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States. Sounds like you are avoiding the core question surrounding the real issue at hand - China and India are among one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas. There is no policy that can change that fact.

vegetablepotpie 5y ago
> There is no policy that can change that fact. That statement is completely false. There are many policies that China and India can enact to reduce production of greenhouse gasses. - put a price on carbon emissions (ex: California cap and trade) - put a tax on carbon (ex: Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act) - provide grants or tax breaks to clean energy projects
- hhw 5y ago
  Why focus on China and India, when on a per capita basis they have a small fraction of the carbon footprint that we have in Canada and the US? When we can get our per capita carbon footprint down below theirs, then maybe we'll have a right to criticize their environmental policies. But in the meantime if we're being at all objective, trying to point a finger at them makes us look like absolute hypocrites.
  - vegetablepotpie 5y ago
    If you read the Great-grand parent comment, which I authored. I advocated for the US to lead by example to encourage other nations to drop their GHG emissions to zero. Having China and India, being large producers of GHGs, reduce their emissions is necessary but not sufficient to stop further climate change.
  - nate_meurer 5y ago
    I agree about the West's hypocrisy, but per-capita emissions is a red herring. Regardless of how many people live there, the Chinese government controls the most polluting economy in the history of civilization. The CCP is thus in the position to help more than any other entity in the world right now.
  - ipaddr 5y ago
    Because removing Canada completely doesn't begin to solve the issue. You need to look at total pollution by country because decisions are made at the country level.
elric 5y ago
What policy are you suggesting? Are you implying that the Chinese (and Indians) are somehow less deserving of living their lives out of poverty and in relative comfort? Because that's what this is ultimately about. These are both countries with huge populations. Populations who until recently were extremely poor. They are becoming less so, sometimes at speeds that are hard to fathom. Do you want to be the person to tell 1 billion Chinese that, no, they can't buy a fridge? China and India aren't vomiting greenhouse gases just to screw the rest of the world. They're doing it to feed their people and enable them to live their lives.
- ipaddr 5y ago
  Why is China producing 5 times more greenhouse gas than India at similiar populations?
throwaway210222 5y ago
> China and India are among one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas. There is no policy that can change that fact. Fine, I'll bite. Presume for a second that the partitioning of India didn't end with Pakistan and Bangladesh, but that the entire sub-continent split into 15 odd countries each with the population of Mexico. Would you still be demanding that just these 15 countries carry the disproportionate burden of solving climate change? You wouldn't, because is would be painfully, obviously dumb to ignore other similar sized groups of countries (Europe, SE asia, etc.) India and China obviously emit more, because they are - uniquely - single countries with continent sized populations. They don't suddenly earn some moral burden for that in an atmosphere that is without borders.
- ipaddr 5y ago
  China produces much for the world. Offshoring production to them has put them in a unique position where they produce much of the world's greenhouse gases. Population size doesn't matter. China produces 5 times more than India. More than double the US at similiar economic levels. China is the problem. China is the solution. China produces more greenhouse gases than all developed nations combined.
  - throwaway210222 5y ago
    > China is the problem. China is the solution. Then I assume the west will ensure China has access to any and all technology that they decide they need, when they need it, how they need it, to reduce their carbon footprint. Because that is what it is going to take.