4 ms·
1987? How could the poor students have known? Gee, 1987, I was at IBM's Watson lab as a researcher in their effort at the time in artificial intelligence. So
by graycat 5y ago
1987? How could the poor students have
known?
Gee, 1987, I was at IBM's Watson lab as a
researcher in their effort at the time in
artificial intelligence.
So, at the lab we had an ambitious
computer services group, and they had for
our general use six mainframes, I believe
all single processor machines, running the
operating system software Virtual
Machine/Conversational Monitor System
(VM/CMS).
For access from home, I had a PC/XT with
some special software to use a standard
dial-up land line telephone line to access
the mainframes. As I recall, the data
rate was about 30 characters per second.
So, the mainframes were likely water
cooled. As I recall, the last of the
water cooled mainframes had a clock speed
of 153 MHz.
In contrast, the last desktop I plugged
together has an AMD (American Micro
Devices) processor, FX-8350. It has 64
bit addressing and 8 cores. The standard
clock speed is 4.0 GHz. To buy the
processor, at Amazon I paid their usual
price, quantity 1, ~$100. Tiny little
thing; came in a tiny little box. The
processor has been fine: It is the basis
of my startup.
So, let's compare, counting clock ticks:
The 6 mainframes had best I can guess at
most in total
6 * 153 = 918
million ticks per second. The AMD has
8 * 4.0 * 1,000 = 32,000
million ticks per second.
Then we can take the ratio
(8 * 4.0 * 1,000) / (6 * 153) = 34.858,387,799,6
Call it 35. Soooo, counting clock ticks
my desktop with the $100 processor from
the tiny box is 35 times faster than all
six of those mainframes combined.
With speculative execution, out of order
execution, pipelining, etc., there is on
average some number of instructions per
clock tick. So, first cut here, and maybe
a gift to the IBM mainframes, for the two
processors count the average number of
instructions per clock tick as the same.
So, this fantastic, we're talking not just
world class but unique in civilization
class, improvement in price/performance,
is much of what enabled Google, Facebook,
Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, AMD, TSMC
(Taiwan Semi-Conductor Manufacturing
Corporation), smart phones, solid state
disks, and essentially all of the
Internet.
E.g., for communications data rates for
connect from home, now with 1 Gbps
Internet versus then, 1987, 300 bps, ...,
to the 56 Kbps of V.90 of 1995.
So, how the heck in 1987 was a computer
science student or early career person to
anticipate and actually believe in this
fantastic, all-time unique step up in
price/performance of computing and
communications along with associated
infrastructure?
This progress blows away wood, wheels,
stone, copper, iron, steel, steam,
electricity, and broadcast radio and TV.
Now, what are we going to do with this
suddenly cheap, powerful computing,
communications, and infrastructure?