3 ms·
I saw no such influx but then again I was only into chili growing, general gardening, photography and that kind of stuff. I'd like to discuss mental health is
by skinkestek 5y ago
I saw no such influx but then again I was only into chili growing, general gardening, photography and that kind of stuff.
I'd like to discuss mental health issues as well but personally I don't feel like posting to ADHD or anything when my family or my boss or my future boss can trivially easy (two clicks, no mental gymnastics) go from my post there to my professional profile.
Besides, the term "far-right" is so utterly abused now that it doesn't mean anything except "people I don't like".
- CRConrad 5y agoWell, good for you that you didn't see that. I, OTOH, definitely did. And, hey, would you have been happier if I'd called them Nazis?
- skinkestek 5y agoI'd be happier if we sometimes, once in a while, called nazis by their full name: National Socialists. Fun fact: Hitler wasn't a right wing guy in any way. He's not known for suggesting Germany introduce a second amendment like law: he was a gun grabber. He's not known for his contributions to (actually) liberal politics or for deepening the theory of the invisible hand or anything. He started as a mad socialist and ended as a mad politician in the center. His "legacy" except millions upon millions of dead (only toppled by fellow madman Stalin?) was gigantic public infrastructure projects, centrally planned, created with the help of private enterprises. Framing nazism as "right wing" is the most brilliant thing the left ever did. Now I am not a Republican either, they have their own issues. But don't use right-wing as a slur that means nazi. And don't call people nazis because you don't like them: nazism exist today and people who call Republicans nazis do us who oppose actual nazism a great disservice I think.
- CRConrad 5y agoReplying to myself for technical reasons: People who bring up how Hitler and the Nazis were "actually Socialists"... are usually actually Nazis.