> A government employee can sexually harassed someone, commit minor crimes, steal, and they are for bidden from being fired. If they're a union employee and th

> A government employee can sexually harassed someone, commit minor crimes, steal, and they are for bidden from being fired. If they're a union employee and they're protected by the union. There are government employees that aren't in unions, and there are private sector employees who are in unions. So again, why hold only public sector employees more responsible? > consider why should employees in the public trust be given greater protections than the private? Well first of all, the employees we're talking about aren't in the public trust. The public trust refers to elected officials (or that some resources are being held for use by the public). You don't elect teachers; they're hired by the school, given too little resources, too many students, too much work to do, put at risk daily, and then we threaten to fire them quicker than we'd fire a hedge fund manager who stole 500 billion dollars of the public's money. Second, we're not talking about whether they get more trust, we're talking about whether or not they should get higher penalties than private-sector employees. You're conflating the two because you don't like the fact that government union workers are protected, which is actually a third thing: 1) should government workers in the public trust get more protections than the private (that depends), 2) why can government workers not get fired easily (because they're in a union, not because they're govt workers), 3) government workers should be fired more easily than private-sector workers (...why?).