3 ms·
Read the article! > The latest lawsuit, filed in India by three academic publishers, including Elsevier, asks the High Court of Delhi to block access to Sci-Hu
by miguelmurca 5y ago
Read the article!
> The latest lawsuit, filed in India by three academic publishers, including Elsevier, asks the High Court of Delhi to block access to Sci-Hub throughout the country. While the case is pending, the court has instructed Sci-Hub to stop uploading papers to its database. The order is not unusual; what’s surprising is that Elbakyan has complied. She has a history of ignoring legal rulings, and the Indian court has no power over Sci-Hub’s activities in other countries. So why has she chosen, at this moment, to give in?
> One reason is that Elbakyan believes she has a shot at winning the case, and her odds might improve if she plays by the rules. “I want the Indian court to finally support free access to science,” she said. If that happened, it would mark a significant victory for Sci-Hub, with reverberations likely beyond India. Victory remains a longshot, but Elbakyan thinks it’s worth the hassle and expense.
- voldacar 5y agoYeah I get that but the what is the upside to winning exactly? You continue doing exactly what you did? It just seems completely irrational
- pessimizer 5y agoThe upside of winning is that you'll never be banned in India, which is the same thing as saying you'll never be banned.
- ValentineC 5y agoI wouldn't say never. Given that it's only the High Court of Delhi so far, there's likely to be another fight in the Supreme Court of India after this.
- captn3m0 5y agoOf specific note is this case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford_v._Rameshwari_Photocopy_Service https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford_v._Ramesh...