Nothing in this article makes sense. Others have pointed out the design argument is silly. I can also find no data that backs up the notion that there are 61

Nothing in this article makes sense. Others have pointed out the design argument is silly. I can also find no data that backs up the notion that there are 61 million disabled drivers out there. It’s certainly possible but no idea where that stat comes from and searching doesn’t find it. The 500 million disposable income is also weird to highlight. That would mean each of the 61 million disabled drivers has about $8.50 in disposable income. That isn’t going to buy them anything ev, or not. So my guess is the article is just mixing lots of different and irrelevant data to try to make a point (and failing)