3 ms·
Isn't that a good outcome? Water efficiency is a net good outcome for your city. Raising costs to recoup the deficit is ok with me, personally, if objectives li
by arbitrary_name 5y ago
Isn't that a good outcome? Water efficiency is a net good outcome for your city. Raising costs to recoup the deficit is ok with me, personally, if objectives like sustainability and efficiency were achieved.
- musingsole 5y agoReducing net water usage by a city == good thing Raising taxes on citizenry because they're using less resources == bad thing worthy of riots
- jbb_hn 5y agoSaving water is a good outcome. It would have been nice if the reward for doing so was less cost, since that was one of the big marketing messages of the campaign. Instead they opted to give us less for more - perhaps that was the intention all along.