You are making my argument for me. Both of these show data that weakly support ivermectin use rather than being against it. The conclusions hide this by focusi

You are making my argument for me. Both of these show data that weakly support ivermectin use rather than being against it. The conclusions hide this by focusing on the deficiencies of the available data, rather than focusing on their informational value. As usual, in case of controversial subject, do not trust the authors to make the correct conclusions, read the paper and the evidence presented. These documents lack data after Jan 2021, so they are outdated. Also they do not seem to be peer-reviewed articles. The Bryant/Lawrie study I linked to is half year newer and peer-reviewed. Much more respectable source and also consistent with FLCCC reports who have first-hand experience with taking care of real patients.