Hey, thanks for checking it out. I'm the founder of the site. I myself have had some qualms about the low-brow nature of some of the discussions. I think as the

Hey, thanks for checking it out. I'm the founder of the site. I myself have had some qualms about the low-brow nature of some of the discussions. I think as the site's interface evolves it's becoming easier to discuss deeper ideas. Here's an interesting discussion on the federal budget: https://hyperarchy.com/questions/394 https://hyperarchy.com/questions/394. But at first it was just my friends talking about their favorite kind of nut. Not world-changing material to be sure. Was it the lack of delegation, or just the non-political / deep nature of many discussions that was most disappointing? What would we need to change to make it more interesting to you? As far as anonymity, making votes public is a controversial choice but it's important to us. We want to heavily favor transparency, and it makes for a more social experience. Looking at other people's votes is actually the number 1 thing people do on Hyperarchy. Thanks for your feedback!