30 ms·
Maybe arbitrary is not the accurate term. I mean if the concern if experiments on live humans then why can't one just specifically address the concern and draw
by matz1 5y ago
Maybe arbitrary is not the accurate term.
I mean if the concern if experiments on live humans then why can't one just specifically address the concern and draw the line ?
- brigandish 5y agoYou could but it would indeed be arbitrary.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- matz1 5y agoIn that case every rule/law is arbitrary.
- brigandish 5y agoNo, because not every rule/law is a case of special pleading. If you think it's not arbitrary then you are free to make that case, and then I or someone else will point out flaws like the special pleading that is already glaring. Peter Singer's work on speciesism is a good place to find out the obstacles you will have in constructing a non-fallacious, non-arbitrary argument.