Ask 10 lawyers about the legality of ML code, and you will get 100 pages of obfuscation and 1/2 answers. The reality is there is zero case law that fits traini

Ask 10 lawyers about the legality of ML code, and you will get 100 pages of obfuscation and 1/2 answers. The reality is there is zero case law that fits training of ML models enough for any legal expert to claim jurisprudence makes it legal. ML is too new of a technology for that claim. If ML model is reproducing verbatim entire sections of code, I fail to see how that is "fair use" and not reproduction. I also fail to see how any legal expert would make the claim that it is. The response of "oops it should not have done that" would also not hold up well in a licensing / copyright dispute