3 ms·
Thanks - I'd missed that. Well that answers the question then!
by klelatti 5y ago
Thanks - I'd missed that. Well that answers the question then!
- aliasEli 5y agoOf course we can trust all people that claim that they were doing nothing illegal. Because they are lawful citizens, we can take their word for it.
- klelatti 5y agoAnswers the question on GH's reasoning rather than the merits of their position.
- aliasEli 5y agoThe problem here is that there are no real links to support their position. Can they provide some real legal evidence?
- throwaway2037 5y agoWhile your question is intellectually worthy, I doubt there is any serious case law in existence testing this scenario. I could imagine very soon, someone will create a video game that can generate art based upon a trained model. At some point, the model will regurtitate an exact replica (or very very close). Someone will screenshot it, and the original artist -- who likely was not paid -- will sue. Or musician. Take your pick. Any performance or visual arts could fall under this umbrella.