It's cohesive at the micro level without expressing anything at the macro level. It's like train of thought writing except it eventually contradicts earlier det

It's cohesive at the micro level without expressing anything at the macro level. It's like train of thought writing except it eventually contradicts earlier details and doesn't necessarily elaborate on anything it builds up to. The parent comment is right that it is gibberish, but it's also wrong in that its comprehensible at the surface level. There's just no depth to it because it is just trying to replicate a form without function.