4 ms·
The way to UX improvements apperently involves forking WxWidgets.
by progre 5y ago
The way to UX improvements apperently involves forking WxWidgets.
- WesolyKubeczek 5y agoThen this is what they should be focusing on. Although, for example, to clean up excessive modals with a lonely OK button that annoy you after every operation, you don’t need to fork wxWidgets, and you need exactly zero telemetry to know it’s annoying.
- TonyTrapp 5y agoAudacity was already using its own wxWidgets fork before the acquisition.
- hashhar 5y agoThere is a lot of flamebait on HN these days. People just regurgitate talking points they see elsewhere without any context. In this case the wxWidgets fork has existed for a very-very long time and has nothing to do with the acquisition.
- aspaceman 5y agoLots of non-technical fud. It's actually really funny because you get to see how poor everyone's technical literacy is. They pretend to be ,very, smart. But then claim a bash script part of the build is selling your soul to Russia or something.