2 ms·
You don't get to magically redefine what "racist" is because the current definition doesn't match up with your narrative. Suburbs are de facto and de jure not
by ta2164 5y ago
You don't get to magically redefine what "racist" is because the current definition doesn't match up with your narrative.
Suburbs are de facto and de jure not racist. No one is stopping any race of people from moving to the suburbs, no law is stopping any members of any race from moving to the suburbs, etc.
You can definitely make the claim that suburbs are classist, but racist? No.
- dillondoyle 5y agoSeriously? If this was reddit i'd say fck off. That's not what I was saying. I'm pointing out that you for instance, could benefit from some perspective in understanding why there is disagreement between because we fundamentally have different word-views / disagree on the language of this argument. It's like trying to argue about bikes, if your definition of bike is a self powered two wheel and mine is a motorized machine.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ta2155 5y ago>I'm pointing out that you for instance, could benefit from some perspective in understanding why there is disagreement between because we fundamentally have different word-views / disagree on the language of this argument. There's objective reality, and then there's narrative safe delusions. I guess you're right, my world-view is objective reality, apparently yours isn't. >It's like trying to argue about bikes, if your definition of bike is a self powered two wheel and mine is a motorized machine. Poor example. What constitutes the definition of a bike is codified in law LOL! There's that de jure and reality striking again.