4 ms·
«no jaywalking» and «no speeding» are two sides of the effort to maintain the order Compromise does not satisfy, but dissatisfies everybody; it does not lead t
by justshowpost 5y ago
«no jaywalking» and «no speeding» are two sides of the effort to maintain the order
Compromise does not satisfy, but dissatisfies everybody; it does not lead to any general fulfillment, but to general frustration; those who try to become everything to all people end up by not being anything to anyone.
- chrisseaton 5y agoI don’t see how they’re two sides to anything? In the UK we have speeding laws but no jaywalking laws. You clearly don’t need both in order to balance or form a compromise.
- justshowpost 5y agoGood to hear, less regulations is better. But yet UK prohibits pedestrians on highways and some other zones and also Occupied Northern Ireland has an offense of «pedestrian through his own negligence on a road endangers his own safety» with obscure «level 3» punishment.
- native_samples 5y agoThat's true but Germany also doesn't have speeding laws on their autobahns, and the UK does, so perhaps speeding laws are also crazy? Where does it end?