3 ms·
Yes. Our government should not be in the business of regulating the distribution of a sequence of words about imaginary wizards. JK is a talented and hard work
by breck 5y ago
Yes. Our government should not be in the business of regulating the distribution of a sequence of words about imaginary wizards.
JK is a talented and hard working writer, and though I'm not a fan personally of those books I respect that they likely are great pieces of work, but I believe we are getting the scraps of what we could get in the Intellectually Oppressed world compared to an Intellectually free world. I'd rather have a world without cancer, a world with 100x more people able to provide medical care, a world with less pollution, than a world of artificial scarcity where a few who go along with a system of oppression get to be billionaires.
- davidjytang 5y ago> Our government should not be in the business of regulating the distribution of a sequence of words about imaginary wizards. So not imaginary wizards then. What should be regulated? Is it nothing? Does your statement become "Our government should not be in the business of regulating the distribution of a sequence of words"?
- breck 5y ago> Does your statement become "Our government should not be in the business of regulating the distribution of a sequence of words"? Yes. Your lungs is a tree that needs healthy air. Your brain is a tree that needs healthy ideas. When people are not free to clean the ideawaves, they fill with pollution, and that is where we find ourselves.
- davidjytang 5y agoBy analogy, are you saying government should not regulate and protect air quality?