If I'm interpreting what the author said correctly, it is an incredibly resounding no. It sounds like these platforms are using the CDC as a credible source fo

If I'm interpreting what the author said correctly, it is an incredibly resounding no. It sounds like these platforms are using the CDC as a credible source for information and the platforms are creating their own guidelines for what can and cannot be said. Being concerned about treating the government as a reliable source of information is one thing, but conflating it with guidance on acceptable speech is quite another.