I can't really tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing, and I'm not even sure a ticket violation is a "crime"? But regardless, I don't understand the need to str

I can't really tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing, and I'm not even sure a ticket violation is a "crime"? But regardless, I don't understand the need to stretch analogies from other domains when there is so much case law out there specifically about EULAs. I'm pretty sure it's well-established [1] that EULAs can be enforceable contracts and breach of them can be treated as a breach of contract. This doesn't depend on there being copyright violations, e.g. there can be different licenses depending on commercial usage vs. non-commercial usage despite the copying being done in exactly the same manner. There should be no need to draw analogies from fare dodging to see what the law says here. I find countless links on this when Googling (and I'm basically leaving a different link in each comment), but see for example [1]. [1] https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/licensing-syndication/849364/covenant-or-condition-when-can-a-licensor-sue-its-licensee-for-copyright-infringement https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/licensing-syndication/84...