3 ms·
Interesting, but not relevant.
by vamsee 15y ago
Interesting, but not relevant.
- ujjvala 15y agoI agree.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- vamsee 15y agoCan you point me where it implies interesting == relevant? This post is geo-political, pure and simple. And I don't see why it belongs on HN.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- tansey 15y ago> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. What is the new phenomenon of which this article is evidence?
- cooldeal 15y agoMost != All The benchmark seems to be if it's intellectually stimulating, which this one seems to be.
- product50 15y agoIt doesn't get upvoted and be featured on the top page of Hacker News if people are not finding it useful. Hacker News is not a website to be defined by you on what is interesting and what is relevant. You are just one of thousands of people visiting this site and it will stay like that - if you find that non-interesting, it is irrelevant.
- vamsee 15y agoOh, why the venom? I'm an Indian, and I personally found it interesting (though it tells me nothing new) but I find it irrelevant to what HN is. Like I mentioned in the reply above, geo-political news is irrelevant to HN discussion unless it has a direct bearing upon startups/programming. I miss the link here.
- dimmuborgir 15y agoI don't see what the fuss is about. A lot of seemingly offtopics have been discussed on HN recently. Like, Japan earthquakes, Osama Bin Laden death, Egypt/Libya civil wars etc.
- burgerbrain 15y agoYes, that is why the fuss. Some of us do not appreciate the trend.
- maw 15y agoSee http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, first section. It may not have been news to you, but some of it was news to me. And definitely interesting.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]