2 ms·
It was "ressources and power". Strategic influence, military bases on the ground (vs. Iran) etc. So if one would characterize complicated geo politics as gamb
by hutzlibu 5y ago
It was "ressources and power".
Strategic influence, military bases on the ground (vs. Iran) etc.
So if one would characterize complicated geo politics as gamble, I think it is fair to say the gamble was lost, considering the huge ressources spend.
- jessaustin 5y agoThe "geopolitics" is just marketing. The point is to spend money that will disappear unaccountably into the Pentagon. Thousands of rich people get even richer. None of them care who is more secure or who dies, here or abroad. All of the fables that USA (war) news media excretes are for the purpose of making those rich people even richer.