4 ms·
This article is bizarre. It considers the case where your CAC is $16, then considers whether you should charge $10/mo or $29/mo. And, uh, yeah, of course, if yo
by dfabulich 5y ago
This article is bizarre. It considers the case where your CAC is $16, then considers whether you should charge $10/mo or $29/mo. And, uh, yeah, of course, if you can raise prices without increasing your CAC/churn, you should obviously do that, but, in the real world, it’s harder to get customers to pay more, and that has to be reflected as higher CAC.
Now, in fact, $10 is often too low, because the CAC of $29/mo isn’t usually that much higher than $10/mo, but it definitely is higher, and numbers like “$10/mo = $1,200/mo run rate, $29/mo = $1M/month run rate” should have forced the author to stop and reflect a little harder on whether these numbers make sense.
Maybe we should charge $99/mo and make a BILLION dollars in the first year, right? Or, why stop there? At a fixed $16 CAC, why not charge $1,000/mo, $10K/mo?
But that’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works!
- shapefrog 5y agoany VC's in here want to invest in this guys billion dollar a year idea?
- cyanydeez 5y agodont think he cares about the velocity argument. hes demonstrating how you need to facto in acceleration when considering your price point. getting your app selling is often a footgun, as you need to understand how maximizing cashflow relates to driving more users to purchase. its definitely an inherent human bias to want to maximize the velocity of sales, and hes demonstrsting that you also need to consider how you accelerate sales.