3 ms·
It's strange how people talk about email hosts as if they mean something. By the same token, gmail.com is headed for the same fate eventually.
by mattgreenrocks 15y ago
It's strange how people talk about email hosts as if they mean something. By the same token, gmail.com is headed for the same fate eventually.
- sliverstorm 15y agoThey do mean something. Not a lot, maybe, but your choice in email host is a reflection on you, the same as your choice in car or clothes or shoes.
- mattgreenrocks 15y agoAh yes, the belief that powers Western capitalism: your choice in trivial matters somehow becomes part of your perceived identity. What does it mean? Can you answer in a way that isn't couched in the fashion of the day? There was a time when a Hotmail account was not looked down upon. What makes this instant in time so different, besides fashion?
- forensic 15y agoHotmail ruined its reputation in a few ways, but the primary way was how they would embed advertisements in your emails. So if you receive an email from an @hotmail person, you also receive a cute little ad!
- cdcarter 15y agoThat, and it took a bit for Hotmail to catch up on having huge mailboxes. It used to be that if you weren't on gmail or a private provider, you probably couldn't handle getting 3-4 CAD files a day for weeks at a time.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- endtime 15y agoWhat on earth does that have to do with capitalism? And what makes you think your choice of how to present yourself doesn't become part of how others perceive you? You might wish to read this: http://lesswrong.com/lw/yp/pretending_to_be_wise/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/yp/pretending_to_be_wise/
- smhinsey 15y agoExcellent link. This phenomenon has been driving me up the wall on another site I frequent and that article captures it well.
- mattgreenrocks 15y agoI don't see how the article applies here, as we're not discussing a matter of significance. Were we discussing something that affected people's lives, it'd be appropriate. But I was being deliberately irreverent towards the notion that one should take care to choose the 'right' email provider. After all, its a fucking email provider. It sends and receives email. That's it. To talk about it as if it is something to take seriously is goofy. Peace.
- sliverstorm 15y agoI wasn't advocating choosing the "right" provider (though you should certainly try to pick a good one, for your own sake!). I have simply found that people's technical competence generally (GENERALLY) corresponds to what domain they are using. It's an observation, not a fashion trend.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- stoney 15y ago> your choice in email host is a reflection on you Actually my choice to use hotmail is a reflection of me X years ago when I created the account. It is also a reflection of the state of free web based providers X years ago. You don't know the value of X, which makes it difficult to draw any conclusions from my email address. I guess it's also a reflection of the current me in that I don't see the point of going through the hassle of ditching an email address just to have something slightly more trendy (and slightly more usable).
- sliverstorm 15y agoSee, I already learned something about you. Ditching an email address doesn't have to be a hassle. Tip: Hook your old and new accounts into Thunderbird with IMAP (IMAP is key. No POP3). Drag-and-drop your folders full of email from Old to New. Wait for it... you're done! Now turn on forwarding in your old email account, and never log in to it again.