4 ms·

This is fatally flawed by virtue of the fact that it's a .com. The US government has already claimed it has jurisdiction over the com TLD. Should a judge agre

This is fatally flawed by virtue of the fact that it's a .com. The US government has already claimed it has jurisdiction over the com TLD. Should a judge agree that means the social network could be shut down just by appropriating the domain. Also, anonymous is supposed to be decentralized whereas this is anything but. I like some of what anonymous does, but I don't trust them at all.

icebraining 15y ago
That site isn't the social network, that apparently is only in planning phase. It's just a forum.
- Groxx 15y ago
  `anonplus.com` is presumably the home of "anon+", not the forum, which is hosted on ZetaBoards.com (another .com there too).