3 ms·
I have Economist feeds like this so what are you seeing that's different? It works fine for Economist feeds in my experience. https://www.economist.com/feeds/p
by sys_64738 5y ago
I have Economist feeds like this so what are you seeing that's different? It works fine for Economist feeds in my experience.
https://www.economist.com/feeds/print-sections/69/leaders.xml https://www.economist.com/feeds/print-sections/69/leaders.xm...
- Havoc 5y agoThis one as an example. ( https://www.economist.com/the-world-this-week/rss.xml https://www.economist.com/the-world-this-week/rss.xml ). No descriptions, useless titles. Business this week Politics this week KAL’s cartoon Politics this week Business this week etc Was more about the wider point than bitching about economist: RSS readers are in a uniquely vulnerable position. There is damn near zero incentive to do this right from providers PoV - if anything the opposite. If you're trying to consume news/info better that seems like a bad starting point to me...even with superior tools. I've got a self-hosted freshrss install floating around on my home server...so might give it another try at some point. Not massively optimistic given the dynamics though. Everything is about dark patterns these days, not open ad free convenient hard to monetize stuff like RSS.