> All of these issues are only going to be correctly handled by legitimate authorities anyways, I don't know why you believe this, because there's mountains of

> All of these issues are only going to be correctly handled by legitimate authorities anyways, I don't know why you believe this, because there's mountains of evidence contradicting this very thought. A simple google search for "poilce misconduct" will give page after page of both studies and individual cases where officers were known be abusive or committing perjury or mishandling evidence and yet this this information remained secret, and the officer remained employed for decades. For instance David Cimperman had a long history of comitting felonies, perjury, and evidence tampering, and yet he became the Chief of Police for Amsterdam, OH. In what world is this considered "correctly handled"? https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2019/04/24/police-officers-police-chiefs-sheriffs-misconduct-criminal-records-database/2214279002/ https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2019/0...