Killing the messenger, really. This stuff has been documented in all sorts of fields, including pharmacology, neuroscience, oncology, you name it. I think there

Killing the messenger, really. This stuff has been documented in all sorts of fields, including pharmacology, neuroscience, oncology, you name it. I think there's been posts here on HN lately about replicability problems with AI research? Psychology is fuzzy because of the subject matter, but (appropriately I think) it's also better at turning the microscope on itself (meta-analysis really has its origins in psychology). Pretending this doesn't happen elsewhere is dangerous. Maybe the rates vary from field to field, but psychology isn't alone. If you applied that standard to every field there would be almost nothing left except maybe physics and some other closely related fields.